Home Wine News Wine Articles Shop for Wine and Wine Accessories About GoodGrape.com Links Downloads Contact Goodgrape.com

Good Grape Wine Company

Left side of the header
Wines and Wine Drinking Accessories
Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home > Books > General AAS > Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine  
Categories
Books
Accessories
Food
Magazines
Related Categories
• General AAS
Qualifying Textbooks
Custom Stores
Specialty Stores
Books
• Spirits
Drinks & Beverages
Cooking, Food & Wine
Subjects
Books
• Wine & Winemaking
Wine
Drinks & Beverages
Cooking, Food & Wine
Subjects
• General
Cooking, Food & Wine
Subjects
Books
• General AAS
Cooking, Food & Wine
Subjects
Books
• Aesthetics
Philosophy
Nonfiction
Subjects
Books
• General
Philosophy
Nonfiction
Subjects
Books
• General AAS
Philosophy
Nonfiction
Subjects
Books
• Hardcover
Binding (binding)
Refinements
Books
• Printed Books
Format (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
Books
Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine
Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine

 enlarge 
Creators: Jancis Robinson, Barry Smith
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Category: Book

List Price: $27.95
Buy New: $9.65
You Save: $18.30 (65%)



New (28) Used (11) from $9.22

Avg. Customer Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars 5 reviews
Sales Rank: 50307

Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 288
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1
Dimensions (in): 8.6 x 5.5 x 1

ISBN: 019533146X
Dewey Decimal Number: 641.22
EAN: 9780195331462
ASIN: 019533146X

Publication Date: October 1, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Hardcover. Slight shelf wear. Brand new, never used. Ships the next business day, with tracking and delivery confirmation sent to your email.

Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 5
 1

5 out of 5 stars Background in Philosophy and a Love of Wine   July 4, 2008
 1 out of 1 found this review helpful

I wouldn't recommend this book unless you are either philosophically minded (i.e. have a background in philosophy) or enjoy scholarly essays. This book is not an introduction to wine, it is not about families in vineyards, about wine lovers and wine-makers sharing their personal tales about wine and the wine experience (although Chapter 10 does focus on Ridge winemaker, Paul Draper and his opinions about wine and wine culture - if you can pick this book up at the library, just read his interview with wine writer Andrew Jefford. It is the most accessible part of the book, revealing the depth and passion of a widely-read, world traveled California winemaker).

If you took a philosophy class in university and didn't enjoy it, I suggest something else. This book is dry, reminiscent of philosophical journals I had to read as an undergraduate. As much as I loved this book, treasured each individual essay, I know it isn't for everyone. The book doesn't focus on grape varieties, doesn't talk about the history of wine, etc...

But again, I loved it. Ten essays, all of them focusing on the philosophical questions circulating around wine appreciation and apprehension. There is discussion about the science of wine, the science of the brain, subjectivity vs. objectivity. If this gets you going, I recommend this book. I found the reading fascinating but slow going, often pausing, putting the book aside over some of the more difficult to grasp concepts. Each essay is worth several reads, if not to enjoy the prose and the arguments but to further dwell on the questions presented. The one question I still come back to: is wine art? Roger Scruton would argue against it as would Tim Crane in this volume. It is a question I often put to my colleagues in the wine industry and the discussion always comes up with something new.

Again, this is a great read, one of my favourites in the literature of wine (The Judgment of Paris by George Taber another) but not for everybody. If you want the challenge and are prepared for it, I say go for it. Others interested in philosophy of wine, check out 'Wine & Philosophy' edited Frit Allhoff... both are great but the latter is suitable for a larger audience.



2 out of 5 stars Questions of Taste is more a question of boring   April 4, 2008
 1 out of 10 found this review helpful

Recently into wine and on the verge of being a wine geek I found this book not well written and a bit boring. It's a struggle and not worth the price of a hardback wait for the paperback or when it gos to the book store on sale.


5 out of 5 stars Great book!   December 17, 2007
 10 out of 11 found this review helpful

A very witty and interesting philosophical guide to wine. It's great to see prominent philosophers not just writing about the usual abstractions but considering the serious puzzles that confront wine-lovers: how can we have a shared vocabulary for describing how wine tastes? Is there really such a thing as expertise in wine-tasting? It even has a chapter on intoxication - most writers seem to miss that aspect of wine-drinking! Definitely the most orginal book on wine I've read. I recommend it especially to people interested in the "wine wars" (Robert Parker vs. the Europeans). It helped me think about the underlying issues (though I didn't change sides afterwards!).


5 out of 5 stars Highly Recommended!   December 13, 2007
 15 out of 16 found this review helpful

A friend had recommended this book to me and, although I enjoy wine and lite philosophy, I have to admit that I was at first daunted by the title. But after another friend, a sommelier, told me that I had to read it, I finally bought it--and loved it! I didn't expect that I, a non-philosopher (though a wine lover), would be able to keep pace but I'm glad to report that I was wrong.

You'll find within this book's pages the best possible presentation of what many may deem a highly subjective topic. What's great about this particular collection of essays is the obvious thought that the editors put into their selections, and how these pieces frame and address the issue. This collection masterfully guides the reader through tricky territory, not in an attempt to find out who's ultimately "right," but to help readers better understand the questions we really ought to be asking. They also address the conditions, both physiological and psychological, that predispose us to these "questions of taste" in the first place. For example, what is meant when we talk about a "fine wine" and why does this phrase carry so much authority? Is taste in us, or is it in the wine? Do experts actually taste things that others can't?

The one thing I want to stress about this book is that, despite the heavy questions it takes on, this is a totally accessible read. Best of all, the quality of writing and thought is not sacrificed in the process. I'd feel more than comfortable recommending this to both the serious and the amateur oenophile. I think that the only people who can walk away from this book without having learned something valuable and new are the editors...

Buy one for yourself, and ten more for your thinker/drinker friends--they'll thank you for it!



5 out of 5 stars It's not a Question of Taste, it's just fantastic   December 11, 2007
 8 out of 9 found this review helpful

Dear philosophers and wine lovers THANKS ! what a wonderfull time I had reading Question of Taste : the philosophy of wine. I particulary enjoyed the multi-talent approaches and review of the wine world, no matter you're a wine expert or a great philosopher to learn, think, smile... and almost taste.
The NY Time review is what triggered my choice (if you don't believe my enthusiastic comment, check the NY Time review).
Question of Taste is the first book on the phylosophy of wine... but it won't be the last of my christmas gifts (what a perfect one !).